Iranian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Iranian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Iranians
Chickasaw
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,989 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.79%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 26.7% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 94.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.2% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 64.0% | 67.1% |
| Median | 64.9% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.6% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |