Ugandan vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Alaskan Athabascans
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,815,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 0.18%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 43.1% | 17.8% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 82.2% |
Mean | 63.6% | 59.5% |
Median | 63.1% | 59.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 67.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |