Ugandan vs Chippewa Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chippewa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Chippewa
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chippewa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.61%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 43.1% | 25.0% |
| Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.5% | 75.0% |
| Mean | 63.6% | 65.2% |
| Median | 63.1% | 63.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 57.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 70.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Chippewa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |