Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chickasaw
64.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
52.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,647,201 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 64.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.12%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 42.7% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 37.9% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 64.7% | 67.1% |
| Median | 65.3% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.1% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.8% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Dutch West Indian (64.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (64.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (64.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Armenian (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
| Ute | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 64.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 64.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 52.5 /100 | #173 | Average 64.3% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 64.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 44.3 /100 | #175 | Average 64.3% |
| Vietnamese | 43.6 /100 | #176 | Average 64.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 42.3 /100 | #177 | Average 64.2% |
| Jamaicans | 40.6 /100 | #178 | Average 64.2% |