Ugandan vs Iroquois Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
Iroquois
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Iroquois
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Iroquois Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,819 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 62.2%, a difference of 0.87%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Iroquois |
Minimum | 43.1% | 26.6% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 73.4% |
Mean | 63.6% | 64.2% |
Median | 63.1% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 60.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 69.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Iroquois by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Cree (62.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Kenya (62.3%, a difference of 0.16%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |