Croatian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Croatian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Croatians
Chickasaw
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,542,706 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 34.4% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 84.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 50.4% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 64.6% | 67.1% |
| Median | 64.2% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.9% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.1% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Croatians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |