Ugandan vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
Carpatho Rusyn
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Carpatho Rusyns
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,690 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 61.1%, a difference of 1.0%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 43.1% | 39.6% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 91.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 51.3% |
Mean | 63.6% | 61.2% |
Median | 63.1% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 55.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 66.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Carpatho Rusyns by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (61.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (61.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Ethiopian (61.2%, a difference of 0.28%), German Russian (60.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Soviet Union (60.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 61.1% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.9% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 60.9% |