Immigrants from Yemen vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Yemen
Chickasaw
63.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,431,124 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 63.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 48.7% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 82.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.6% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 63.2% | 67.1% |
| Median | 61.9% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.8% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Immigrants from Bulgaria (63.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (63.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (63.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (62.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Serbian (63.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |