Immigrants from Zaire vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Chickasaw
59.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,246,225 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.417 and weighted average of 59.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 8.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 14.5% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 98.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.1% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 59.2% | 67.1% |
| Median | 59.4% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.7% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.5% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Immigrants from Congo (59.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Senegalese (59.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Sudanese (60.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Senegal (60.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from Sudan (60.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 61.1% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.9% |
| Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 60.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 60.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 60.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 60.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 60.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 59.8% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 59.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 59.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 57.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |