Ugandan vs African Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Africans
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,598,671 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.70%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | African |
Minimum | 43.1% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 67.4% |
Mean | 63.6% | 62.8% |
Median | 63.1% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 58.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 66.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Iroquois (62.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |