Creek vs Chickasaw Average Family Size
COMPARE
Creek
Chickasaw
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Creek
Chickasaw
3.20
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.19
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
6.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chickasaw Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,281 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433 and weighted average of 3.20. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19, a difference of 0.35%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.00 | 2.14 |
| Maximum | 5.25 | 4.35 |
| Range | 3.25 | 2.21 |
| Mean | 3.29 | 3.19 |
| Median | 3.16 | 3.16 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.04 | 3.04 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.40 | 3.32 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.51 | 0.38 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.51 | 0.37 |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Chickasaw by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Iran (3.20, a difference of 0.0%), Zimbabwean (3.20, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (3.20, a difference of 0.020%), Somali (3.20, a difference of 0.040%), and Sudanese (3.20, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Cree (3.19, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Sudanese | 13.3 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.20 |
| Zimbabweans | 12.6 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.20 |
| Immigrants | Iran | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.20 |
| Creek | 12.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.20 |
| Mongolians | 11.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.20 |
| Somalis | 11.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 3.20 |
| Delaware | 11.1 /100 | #215 | Poor 3.20 |
| Bermudans | 11.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 3.20 |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 10.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 3.20 |
| French American Indians | 9.8 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.20 |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 9.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Lebanese | 9.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 7.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 7.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Syrians | 6.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Cree | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.19 |