Japanese vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Japanese
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Japanese
Chickasaw
12.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,049,051 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 30.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.7% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 51.4% |
Range | 27.4% | 49.5% |
Mean | 15.2% | 23.7% |
Median | 14.1% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Hawaiian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Scottish (12.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch (12.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Irish (12.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Spaniards | 1.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
Germans | 1.1 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
Irish | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
Dutch | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |
Japanese | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.3% |
Scottish | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |
Mexicans | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.4% |
Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.4% |
English | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.4% |
German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.5% |
Malaysians | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.5% |
Senegalese | 0.5 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |