Japanese vs White/Caucasian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
White/Caucasian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Japanese
Whites/Caucasians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs White/Caucasian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,529,348 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.619 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.75%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 4.3% |
| Range | 13.7% | 2.2% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.50% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.41% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 0.41% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Whites/Caucasians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |