Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Chickasaw
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,290 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 37.8%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 56.8% |
| Range | 25.3% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 22.9% |
| Median | 11.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |