Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Macedonian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Macedonian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Macedonians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Macedonian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,290 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,656,892 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.14%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 29.6% | 21.7% |
| Range | 25.3% | 20.1% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 10.8% |
| Median | 11.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Macedonians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |