Serbian vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Serbian
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Serbians
Chickasaw
11.5%
MALE DISABILITY
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,640,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 31.0%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 48.7% | 56.8% |
| Range | 44.3% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 22.9% |
| Median | 14.3% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from Cambodia (11.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Ukrainian (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Icelander (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 16.3 /100 | #198 | Poor 11.5% |
| Lebanese | 15.4 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 13.0 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.5% |
| Jamaicans | 10.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 10.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.5% |
| Serbians | 10.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.5% |
| Ukrainians | 10.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 10.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.5% |
| Icelanders | 10.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 10.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.6% |
| Ute | 9.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 8.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 8.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |