Immigrants from Japan vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Chickasaw
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,135,143 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 45.6%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 51.6% | 56.8% |
| Range | 49.5% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 22.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from South America (10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Tongan (10.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Australia (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Peruvian (10.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Tongans | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |