Central American vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Chickasaw
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,432,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 39.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.3% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 56.8% |
Range | 15.5% | 50.1% |
Mean | 9.3% | 22.9% |
Median | 9.7% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 24.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |