South African vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
South African
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
South Africans
Chickasaw
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,590,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 37.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 56.8% |
| Range | 22.3% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 22.9% |
| Median | 10.8% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |