Immigrants from Costa Rica vs South American Indian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
South American Indian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
South American Indians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs South American Indian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,290 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.61%.

Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | South American Indian |
Minimum | 4.3% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 27.7% |
Range | 25.3% | 23.4% |
Mean | 12.4% | 13.3% |
Median | 11.2% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American Indians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |