Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,823,387 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 18.9%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Costa Rica	Chickasaw
Minimum	2.3%	3.3%
Maximum	50.0%	100.0%
Range	47.7%	96.7%
Mean	16.8%	27.0%
Median	15.7%	23.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.6%	18.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.9%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.3%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.6%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.4%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from South America (16.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Celtic (16.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Kenyan (16.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Hawaiians	45.5 /100 \| #180	Average 16.5%
South American Indians	44.3 /100 \| #181	Average 16.5%
Lebanese	43.3 /100 \| #182	Average 16.6%
Kenyans	41.0 /100 \| #183	Average 16.6%
Celtics	40.6 /100 \| #184	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	40.4 /100 \| #185	Average 16.6%
Hmong	38.4 /100 \| #186	Fair 16.6%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	37.8 /100 \| #187	Fair 16.7%
Immigrants \| South America	37.7 /100 \| #188	Fair 16.7%
Immigrants \| Morocco	34.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 16.7%
Arabs	31.1 /100 \| #190	Fair 16.8%
Alaska Natives	29.8 /100 \| #191	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Uganda	21.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 17.0%
Immigrants \| Iraq	21.6 /100 \| #193	Fair 17.0%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	21.2 /100 \| #194	Fair 17.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.6%
Guyanese	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.6%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.6%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%
Belizeans	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 19.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.0%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.0%