Immigrants from Jordan vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Chickasaw
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,276,340 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 42.9%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 18.2% | 56.8% |
| Range | 13.0% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 22.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Zimbabwean (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bulgarians | 98.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 97.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 97.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 97.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |