Central American vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Central American
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Central Americans
Chickasaw
11.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
59.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,944,688 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 44.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.3% | 51.4% |
Range | 19.5% | 49.5% |
Mean | 10.2% | 23.7% |
Median | 10.1% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Haitian (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (11.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Italian (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Austrian (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Guyana | 70.1 /100 | #161 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.6 /100 | #163 | Good 11.1% |
Pakistanis | 65.8 /100 | #164 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 63.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.1% |
Austrians | 63.2 /100 | #167 | Good 11.1% |
Central Americans | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 11.2% |
Haitians | 59.0 /100 | #169 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 58.0 /100 | #170 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.9 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Italians | 55.6 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 51.8 /100 | #173 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.3% |
Czechs | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |