Central American vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Chickasaw
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,607,285 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 3.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 51.9% | 33.3% |
Range | 49.3% | 29.7% |
Mean | 14.7% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.8% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |