Central American vs Immigrants from Sweden Male Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Immigrants from Sweden
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Immigrants from Sweden
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Immigrants from Sweden Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,432,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,748,272 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Immigrants from Sweden |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 49.0% |
| Range | 15.5% | 44.6% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 14.3% |
| Median | 9.7% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Immigrants from Sweden by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Uganda (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Romania (10.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 96.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Uruguayans | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 95.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |