Central American vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Immigrants from South Africa
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Immigrants from South Africa
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,432,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,300,500 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.17%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 30.0% |
| Range | 15.5% | 29.0% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 13.2% |
| Median | 9.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Immigrants from South Africa by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |