Guatemalan vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Lithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Guatemalans
Lithuanians
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
17.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,569,412 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,961,459 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 44.5% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 83.5% | 76.6% |
Range | 39.0% | 43.3% |
Mean | 64.4% | 59.0% |
Median | 65.6% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.9% | 54.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.3% | 64.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 9.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Guamanian/Chamorro (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Latin America (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovene (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Jamaican (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |