Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ghanaian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Ghanaian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Ghanaians
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ghanaian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,433,983 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,278,551 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 13.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 3.1% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
Range | 96.9% | 50.5% |
Mean | 24.5% | 22.2% |
Median | 19.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.2% | 23.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (21.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |