Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Welsh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Welsh

Fair
Good
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,335
SOCIAL INDEX
60.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
156th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Welsh Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,932,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Welsh.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Welsh Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 33.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $93,039, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $100,322, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $37,856, a difference of 10.3%), median earnings ($39,169 compared to $45,710, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $50,597, a difference of 16.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Fair
$43,233
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Average
$102,151
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Fair
$83,628
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Fair
$45,710
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Average
$54,647
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Tragic
$37,856
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$50,597
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Fair
$93,039
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Average
$100,322
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Average
$60,666
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
28.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 47.5%), family poverty (11.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and single female poverty (25.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
14.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
30.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
42.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.3%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Fair
32.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 42.8%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 33.0%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
60.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.5%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Fair
45.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Welsh Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoWelsh
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Excellent
47.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%