European vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,640,249 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.842. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to an increase of 94.6 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,836 compared to $54,159, a difference of 18.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,310 compared to $111,676, a difference of 13.6%), and median male earnings ($57,637 compared to $64,987, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $54,571, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,779 compared to $69,003, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.35%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.42%), currently married (49.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.8%).