Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
90.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,320,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,688,443 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 27.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 37.1% | 45.6% |
| Range | 33.7% | 41.0% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 21.5% |
| Median | 11.8% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from Sudan (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Estonian (12.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.95%), Dutch West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |