Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,308,086 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%, a difference of 9.9%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Africa	Chickasaw
Minimum	6.3%	5.6%
Maximum	73.0%	100.0%
Range	66.7%	94.4%
Mean	35.0%	53.6%
Median	35.7%	47.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	30.1%	34.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	39.8%	70.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.7%	36.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.0%	25.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.9%	25.3%

Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Ute (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Immigrants	20.6 /100 \| #197	Fair 32.7%
Costa Ricans	20.3 /100 \| #198	Fair 32.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	18.9 /100 \| #199	Poor 32.8%
Immigrants \| Germany	18.8 /100 \| #200	Poor 32.8%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	16.7 /100 \| #201	Poor 32.9%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	16.6 /100 \| #202	Poor 32.9%
Ute	14.4 /100 \| #203	Poor 33.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	14.3 /100 \| #204	Poor 33.0%
German Russians	13.1 /100 \| #205	Poor 33.1%
Uruguayans	12.8 /100 \| #206	Poor 33.1%
Immigrants \| Sudan	11.5 /100 \| #207	Poor 33.2%
Hawaiians	11.3 /100 \| #208	Poor 33.2%
Whites/Caucasians	10.7 /100 \| #209	Poor 33.3%
Scotch-Irish	10.7 /100 \| #210	Poor 33.3%
Ecuadorians	10.5 /100 \| #211	Poor 33.3%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.6 /100 \| #248	Tragic 35.5%
Bermudans	0.6 /100 \| #249	Tragic 35.5%
Mexican American Indians	0.4 /100 \| #250	Tragic 35.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 36.0%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 36.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	0.2 /100 \| #253	Tragic 36.2%
Potawatomi	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 36.2%
Chickasaw	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 36.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 36.3%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 36.3%
Americans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 36.4%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 36.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 36.5%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 36.5%
French American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 36.6%