Cuban vs Celtic No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cuban
Celtic
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cubans
Celtics
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Celtic No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,809,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,703,210 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 5.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 20.7% | 21.5% |
| Range | 19.9% | 21.0% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 7.1% |
| Median | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Celtics by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.86%), Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.89%), Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.92%), Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Spaniard (8.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Venezuela (8.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Mexico (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |