Cuban vs Immigrants from Germany No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cuban
Immigrants from Germany
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cubans
Immigrants from Germany
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Immigrants from Germany No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,809,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,346,961 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Immigrants from Germany |
Minimum | 0.80% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 20.7% | 75.4% |
Range | 19.9% | 72.6% |
Mean | 7.7% | 9.4% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Germany by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |