Lumbee vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Lumbee
 South African
 Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Lumbee
South Africans
33.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,145,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254 and weighted average of 33.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,239,967 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 105.0%.
 
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | South African | 
| Minimum | 16.3% | 4.4% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 36.2% | 
| Range | 83.7% | 31.8% | 
| Mean | 50.2% | 17.2% | 
| Median | 47.5% | 14.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.2% | 12.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.3% | 21.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.1% | 9.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.0% | 8.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 7.8% | 
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Puerto Rican (34.5%, a difference of 3.7%), Navajo (31.6%, a difference of 5.4%), Crow (31.0%, a difference of 7.4%), Yuman (29.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and Tohono O'odham (29.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 25.6%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 25.7%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 25.7%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 26.9%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 27.4%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 27.7%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 27.7%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 28.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 29.3%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 29.5%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 29.5%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 31.0%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 31.6%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 33.3%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 34.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are British (16.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Norway (16.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from England (16.2%, a difference of 0.49%), Finnish (16.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and Serbian (16.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 | 
| Mongolians | 92.5 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 16.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.0 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 16.1%  | 
| Austrians | 92.0 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 16.1%  | 
| Swiss | 92.0 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 16.1%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 91.8 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 16.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 91.8 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 16.2%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 91.5 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 16.2%  | 
| South Africans | 90.1 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 16.2%  | 
| British | 89.4 /100 | #129  | Excellent 16.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #130  | Excellent 16.3%  | 
| Finns | 88.3 /100 | #131  | Excellent 16.3%  | 
| Serbians | 88.2 /100 | #132  | Excellent 16.3%  | 
| Icelanders | 87.9 /100 | #133  | Excellent 16.3%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 87.8 /100 | #134  | Excellent 16.4%  | 
| Brazilians | 87.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 16.4%  |