Immigrants from China vs Czechoslovakian Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Czechoslovakian
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Czechoslovakians
26.1%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Czechoslovakian Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,985,494 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 26.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,570,470 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 13.9%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 12.6% | 10.8% |
Maximum | 53.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.0% | 89.2% |
Mean | 24.9% | 47.5% |
Median | 23.4% | 38.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 30.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 61.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 30.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 23.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Mother Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (26.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (26.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Pakistan (26.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Korea (26.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Burmese (26.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 26.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 26.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 26.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 26.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Haiti (29.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (29.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Panama (29.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Swiss (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Malaysian (29.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 29.6% |
Cubans | 20.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 29.6% |
Panamanians | 20.0 /100 | #200 | Fair 29.6% |
Belgians | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 29.7% |
Malaysians | 17.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 29.7% |
Swiss | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 29.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 16.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 29.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 16.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 29.7% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 15.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 29.7% |
Immigrants | Panama | 15.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 29.8% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 14.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 29.8% |
Irish | 13.9 /100 | #209 | Poor 29.8% |
Haitians | 13.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 29.8% |
Guyanese | 12.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 29.8% |
Nicaraguans | 12.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 29.8% |