Czechoslovakian vs Finnish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Finnish
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Finns
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Finnish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,117,006 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 0.83%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Finnish |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 44.2% | 41.3% |
Range | 43.1% | 39.2% |
Mean | 11.8% | 10.3% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Finns by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Belgian (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Bhutanese (9.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and British (9.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |