Czechoslovakian vs Chinese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Chinese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Chinese
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Chinese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 13.5%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 44.2% | 20.4% |
| Range | 43.1% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 8.4% |
| Median | 9.7% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Belgian (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Tlingit-Haida (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 4.8%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and Danish (8.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |