Zimbabwean vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Choctaw
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 39.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 12.6% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.6% | 87.4% |
Mean | 18.9% | 41.2% |
Median | 18.6% | 38.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 46.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |