Zimbabwean vs Liberian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Liberian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Liberians
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Liberian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,657,601 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 22.4%, a difference of 14.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Liberian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 59.7% | 58.7% |
| Range | 58.6% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 23.0% |
| Median | 18.6% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 27.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Belizean (22.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |