Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,303,700 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 0.58%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Sierra Leone |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 52.1% |
Range | 58.6% | 50.2% |
Mean | 18.9% | 17.6% |
Median | 18.6% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 21.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |