Apache vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Apache
Choctaw
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 16.4% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.6% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 48.6% | 41.2% |
| Median | 40.7% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.0% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.9% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |