Zimbabwean vs Peruvian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Peruvian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Peruvians
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Peruvian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,317,102 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Peruvian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 56.3% |
Range | 58.6% | 51.9% |
Mean | 18.9% | 21.5% |
Median | 18.6% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 23.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Peruvians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (19.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Immigrants from Turkey (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Russia (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |