Zimbabwean vs Icelander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Icelander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Icelanders
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Icelander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,245,143 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 10.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Icelander |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 59.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.6% | 96.1% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 39.4% |
| Median | 18.6% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 55.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 33.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 26.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 25.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |