Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Middle Africa
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,606,644 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 22.3%, a difference of 27.4%.
![Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/ute-vs-immigrants-from-middle-africa-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 18.0% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 44.1% |
Range | 82.0% | 42.0% |
Mean | 43.7% | 19.9% |
Median | 37.5% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.8% | 24.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ute by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |