Ute vs Cajun Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Cajun
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Cajuns
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Cajun Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,582,163 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 30.6%, a difference of 7.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Cajun |
| Minimum | 18.0% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.0% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 43.7% | 40.8% |
| Median | 37.5% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 29.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.8% | 50.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Cajuns by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |