Bhutanese vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Slavic
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Slavs
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,876,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Slavic |
Minimum | 0.54% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 49.5% | 40.0% |
Range | 48.9% | 39.0% |
Mean | 5.1% | 7.6% |
Median | 3.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 9.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |