Seminole vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Slavic
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Seminole
Slavs
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,024,519 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,876,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 44.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Slavic |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 40.0% |
| Range | 31.9% | 39.0% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 7.6% |
| Median | 7.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.50%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |