Slovene vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slovene
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Slovenes
Immigrants from South Central Asia
3.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,368,188 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 3.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,887,426 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 11.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slovene | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 0.24% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 12.4% |
Range | 14.2% | 11.8% |
Mean | 3.8% | 3.6% |
Median | 3.3% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.76%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |