Salvadoran vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,885,602 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,926,469 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 28.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Salvadoran | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 19.7% | 14.6% |
Range | 19.3% | 14.0% |
Mean | 7.2% | 5.8% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |